A Look at Puff Bar and Its Try to Displace the Disposable E-Cigarette
Much remains unknown about the all-popular disposable electronic cigarette referred to as the Puff Bar. Because the devices have become extremely popular with younger people recently, much as flavored e-cigs have been popular among adults, so too has Puff Bar. It really is difficult to classify the device as a scam due to the fact that nobody really knows who designs and produces the Puff Bar and where it originated from. However, most of the features linked to the Puff Bar make it seem more than just another cheap electronic cigarette. Lets look deeper into the mystery of this seemingly new product.
One of the biggest mysteries about Puff Bar is apparently its manufacturing and distribution. The company doesn’t even list a physical address on their website. Almost all of the other major manufacturers of the sort of puff disposable devices, like the Hitachi and Kronic, have addresses listed on the websites. Puff Bar’s manufacturer, though, doesn’t offer any. Their only contact information is really a telephone number that’s not recognized.
This insufficient contact information makes it looks as if the company doesn’t really care to make certain that their product is sold in america. There are a variety of different theories surrounding the business behind Puff Bar and their products. Some say that Puff Bar is an attempt by Kronic to have a leadership position in the electronic cigarette market by launching something that appears to be strongly like the Kronic product. Kronic developed its flavored disposable e-liquid cigarettes that use tobacco products, but didn’t go public until very recently.
Others believe that Puff Bar is merely an attempt to capture exactly the same profits because the tobacco industry. They argue vapinger.com that there is not enough money obtainable in the marketplace for two companies to compete successfully with each other when there are at the very least three other companies that produce high quality nicotine-free cartridges which are more expensive than the typical disposable style. The result is that consumers will need to select from the expensive nicotine products and the less expensive puff bars. Many consumers, especially adults, are willing to accept the higher cost of the refill kit over needing to make a purchase of yet another cartridge. In essence, they’re trading in one product for another they can both enjoy for exactly the same price.
A more likely theory surrounding Puff Bar is that it’s part of a marketing effort to improve awareness of Kronic’s own line of nicotine based cartridges. Lots of the claims which have been made about Puff Bar are similar to those made about Kronic’s own Nic Fontenelle products. The largest difference is that Kronic offers a Pod device in addition to the puff bars. Although it is unclear what the goal of the Pod device is, the fact that it can resemble a pod device utilized by smokers to transport their liquid nicotine has led many to believe that Puff Bar is intended to be used with the Pod. The problem with this interpretation is that there is no way to know set up company intended for Puff Bar to function this way. With the rise of the pre-filled device, it appears likely that this interpretation could be proven wrong.
The second most common explanation for why Puff Bar has been positioned as a replacement for the disposable pod device is due to its claim to offer a number of allergenic flavors. Since Puff Bar will come in a variety of flavors, chances are that this aspect was regarded as a desirable feature by the company prior to its appearance out there. The simple truth is that Puff Bar is difficult to find in stores without causing a operate on the product. This is due to unlike a disposable pod device, where customers can choose from various standard flavor offerings, Puff Bar is only offered in a single flavor (Tobacco) along with a number of different inhalation methodologies. This limits the ability of consumers to purchase based on their personal preferences. In addition, Puff Bar is only appropriate for an electronic cigarette, meaning that smokers must use the pre-filled device to take it out of their mouths.
The final explanation why Puff Bar is being positioned as a potential replacement to the disposable device is due to its claim to offer around 300 puffs flavors. Guava is one of the most popular and most well known flavors in Puff Bar’s lineup. Although it is clear that guava is popular among consumers, it should be noted that the company will not expect guava to become a long-term alternative to cigarettes. As smoking rates continue to decline, the popularity of Puff Bar will likely grow. It is unknown if guava will see a place in the product lineup over time, since it is not currently contained in Puff Bar, but it is possible that it could create a debut down the road. For now, it appears that guava is not a flavor which will be viewed as desirable by consumers looking for an alternative to cigarette smoking.
In conclusion, it is unclear whether Puff Bar is right for every consumer looking for an alternative solution to cigarette smoking. Having less nicotine makes it problematic for people to become addicted to smoking, while the selection of flavors makes it easy to find a favorite. However, for individuals who are interested to find a convenient and flavorful alternative to smoking cigarettes, Puff Bar products might be right for you. Without an ideal product, Puff Bar does offer some exciting flavors which have yet to be provided by other companies in the e cigarette products market.